tidypolars
slower than polars
?No, or just marginally. The objective of tidypolars
is
not to modify the data, simply to translate the
tidyverse
syntax to polars
syntax.
polars
is still in charge of doing all the data
manipulations under the hood.
Therefore, there might be minor overhead because we still need to
parse the expressions and rewrite them in polars
syntax
(see the Parsing
expressions vignette) but this should be marginal.
tidypolars
?No, tidypolars
will always return
DataFrame
s, LazyFrame
s or Series
.
Therefore, if at some point you want to use polars
because
you need more control or because you want to reduce your number of
dependencies, you can easily do so.
polars
?Yes, because tidypolars
doesn’t provide any functions to
create polars
DataFrame
or
LazyFrame
or to read data. You’ll still need to use
polars
for this.
Making accurate benchmarks of data wrangling tools is difficult and I won’t try to do it here (I just put one of the homepage to give an idea of the performance, but it is by no means comprehensive). You should refer to DuckDB benchmarks.